Skip to main content

Four reasons not to own high yield – and why they miss the mark

Jack Holmes says misconceptions about the high-yield bond market have opened a huge opportunity for investors who are willing to look at areas that others simply avoid.

Why would an investor want to buy high-yield bonds now? Spreads look tight, risk-free rates already offer mid-single digit returns, tight monetary policy leads to investors taking risk off the table and equities look like they will offer better returns. So high yield seems like an obvious part of the market to avoid, right?

We disagree. Let’s go through each of the four statements above to explain why.

1. High-yield spreads are too tight

There are two elements here. The first is the abstract idea that a single measure of high yield ‘spread’ is representative of thousands of underlying instruments. Are we referring to Isabel Marant Group 8% 2028 notes with a spread of 1,462bps as being tight? Or maybe Drax 6.625% 2025 notes with a spread of 0bps? We do not own the index (just a few percent of it) and therefore the average is a meaningless concept to us.

The second is that spreads in high-yield bonds are not comparable to those in other fixed income markets. Unlike with government or investment grade bonds, for example, high-yield bonds have different potential redemption dates, and the timing of these – and the cash price paid – can have an enormous impact on spreads.

As an example, we own Penske Automotive Group September 2025 notes. These bonds currently trade at a spread to worst (the figure used in index ‘spread’ numbers) of 92bps over Treasuries. Now, it is a BB (meaning it is towards the higher quality end of the high-yield spectrum) with a $10 billion market cap, estimated to generate $900m of free cashflow this year, and the $550m 2025 bond is the first debt maturity, so that stated 92bps yield pickup over a 2025 Treasury looks fair.

However, these bonds are unlikely to see September 2025. Over the past year, the average high-yield bond has been redeemed 15 months before maturity1. If we assume Penske’s bonds get redeemed 12 months early, the spread over Treasuries jumps to 850bps. That’s quite a difference from 92bps.

The number of bonds available below ‘par’ – and therefore with capital upside to an early redemption – has never been as high as today, outside of periods of extreme stress2. And that neatly illustrates why the index spread levels for shorter-dated high-yield bonds are largely irrelevant in today’s market.

2. Risk-free rates are more attractive

It is true that risk-free rates look attractive today. The issue is that as time goes on, the opportunity cost from sitting in cash and cash equivalents rather than higher-yielding parts of the market compounds.

Let’s take an investor who bought US T-bills (short-dated US government bonds) the moment they passed a 3% yield (30 September 2022) and held them through to today.

They would have made a total return of 7.8% over this time. Not too shabby. But over the same period, our Artemis Funds (Lux) – Global High Yield Bond Fund delivered a total return of 19.3%3.

The missed carry from high-yield relative to risk-free rates over the period means that even if there were a significant market downturn from here, the investor who remained in cash the whole time would likely still end up worse off versus the one who remained in high-yield bonds.

3. Tight monetary policy leads to a risk-off environment

While tight monetary policy does cause investors to sell riskier assets, high-yield bonds tend to do well in these periods.

Since the beginning of the 1980s, there have been eight hiking cycles that ended in cutting cycles. The average one-year total return on US high yield from the time of the first cut has been +7.1%4. Put simply, the end of a hiking cycle (in other words, the start of a cutting cycle) tends to be good, not bad, for high yield.

4. Equities offer more attractive returns

Equities have had a great run of late. And as our head of fixed income Stephen Snowden likes to say, everyone should buy equity funds.

However, with yield levels where they are today, returns from our area of the market have historically been comparable to those from equities.

The US high-yield market currently yields 8.2%. Based on the US high-yield index and the MSCI World index, when yields exceed 8%, the average three-year annualised return on high yield has been 2.6 percentage points above that seen on equities.

I do not want to leave anyone thinking they should not own equities – they should – but high yield at these valuations offers a very nice complement to other portfolio assets from both a return, and a risk, perspective.

The opportunity available in high yield

There is a common thread running through what generates outperformance – looking at things a little differently and finding opportunities in areas where others simply do not bother to look. The high-yield market offers a huge opportunity for investors who are willing to do just this.

Ultimately, I think the question is not why should you own high-yield bonds at this point, but more why wouldn’t you?

1Bloomberg, Bank of America, Artemis, ICE Fixed Income Indices (US High Yield 1-3yr index) as at 19 February 2024.
2ICE BofA indices as at 31 March 2024.
3Bloomberg/Lipper to 30 April 2024.
4ICE BofA indices

 

Investment in a fund concerns the acquisition of units/shares in the fund and not in the underlying assets of the fund.

Reference to specific shares or companies should not be taken as advice or a recommendation to invest in them.

For information on sustainability-related aspects of a fund, visit the relevant fund page on this website.

For information about Artemis’ fund structures and registration status, visit artemisfunds.com/fund-structures

Any research and analysis in this communication has been obtained by Artemis for its own use. Although this communication is based on sources of information that Artemis believes to be reliable, no guarantee is given as to its accuracy or completeness.

Any statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions and are subject to change without notice. They are not intended to provide investment advice and should not be construed as a recommendation.

Third parties (including FTSE and Morningstar) whose data may be included in this document do not accept any liability for errors or omissions. For information, visit artemisfunds.com/third-party-data.

Important information
The intention of Artemis’ ‘investment insights’ articles is to present objective news, information, data and guidance on finance topics drawn from a diverse collection of sources. Content is not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security or investment by Artemis or any third-party. Potential investors should consider the need for independent financial advice. Any research or analysis has been procured by Artemis for its own use and may be acted on in that connection. The contents of articles are based on sources of information believed to be reliable; however, save to the extent required by applicable law or regulations, no guarantee, warranty or representation is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions, expectations and projections. Articles are provided to you only incidentally, and any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The source for all data is Artemis, unless stated otherwise. The value of an investment, and any income from it, can fall as well as rise as a result of market and currency fluctuations and you may not get back the amount originally invested.