Artemis SmartGARP UK Equity Fund update
Philip Wolstencroft, manager of the Artemis SmartGARP UK Equity Fund, reports on the fund over the quarter to 30 June 2024 and the outlook.
Source for all information: Artemis as at 30 June 2024 unless otherwise stated.
- The fund's performance was behind the benchmark in the quarter, still ahead year to date
- Bank of Georgia held back performance, but good news continues
- The aggregate PE of the fund's holdings is 7.1, yet the stocks are seeing share buybacks and upgrades
The fund's return was +0.3% in the second quarter and is +10.5% year to date. The respective numbers for the benchmark are +3.7% and +7.4%. So, the stocks we own are delivering good returns and are outperforming the market so far this year, but our lead shrank a bit in the last quarter. There is a tendency for commentators to focus month to month or quarter to quarter outcomes. The reality is that if we stick to doing simple things well, we can grind out small excess returns and end up way ahead of the competition.
Three months | Six months | One year | Three years | Five years | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artemis SmartGARP UK Equity Fund | 0.3% | 10.5% | 15.7% | 32.8% | 62.4% |
FTSE All-Share | 3.7% | 7.4% | 13.0% | 23.9% | 30.9% |
IA UK All Companies Average | 3.9% | 6.9% | 12.5% | 8.9% | 23.4% |
Our investment process has evolved (glacially) over the past two decades and it would appear to be effective. Essentially, we try to buy stocks that are lowly priced, growing and delivering pleasant surprises. The result is that we own stocks whose fundamentals end up having a better combination of growth and income than the market and our competitors. While it can sometimes feel uncomfortable to 'be different', we end up with a bunch of stocks that bear little resemblance to either the market or our competitors. Looking at the statistics above – this is probably a good thing.
Three months ago, our top five holdings included the likes of GlaxoSmithKline, Barclays, Bank of Georgia, Imperial Brands (Tobacco) and Marks & Spencer. They are still all in our top six, with Shell bumping out M&S. Nevertheless, Bank of Georgia (as the name suggests the main commercial bank in the country of Georgia) went from 5.1% to 3.7% partially because we started to take profits but mostly because the stock fell sharply on concerns over politics (Georgian not UK).
Politics notwithstanding, Bank of Georgia's underlying business has actually improved of late (it has cost to income, return on equity and levels of technology that UK banks can only dream of). Fortunately, it is quoted on the UK stock market and so clients have easy access to world class returns. A PE multiple of below 4x is just too low when the 10-year track record is for earnings per share to outgrow the UK market by over 20% per annum and all the evidence points to business as normal.
For the fund in total the prospective PE is 7.1x whereas the market is on 11.4x earnings. This ought to mean that we have poor quality companies. In reality, our companies are growing in line with their competitors, buying in shares (-3% over the past year) and seeing upgrades to profit forecasts (+3% in the past quarter). Over the past two decades the fundamental value per share of our fund has outgrown the market by about 2% per annum. There is no reason to suppose that this trend is over and I suspect that our fund will continue to stumble across companies with winning fundamentals. Ultimately share prices track these fundamentals:
SmartGARP UK
My view is that if we keep nudging our portfolio towards companies with good financial characteristics the probability increases that the result will be good financial returns over the long term.