Skip to main content

Artemis High Income Fund update

David Ennett, Ed Legget and Jack Holmes, managers of the Artemis High Income Fund, report on the fund over the quarter to 31 March 2025.

Source for all information: Artemis as at 31 March 2025, unless otherwise stated.

Overview

The year got off to a busy start, with volatility in government bond markets, question marks over the dominant AI narrative and the fallout from Donald Trump’s opening gambit in the tariff wars. Here in the UK, concerns around growth and inflation led to higher gilt yields, in turn reducing the chancellor’s fiscal headroom and raising fears that we would see further tax rises and spending cuts.

Later in the period, concerns around UK stagflation rapidly faded into the background as investor attention switched across the Atlantic and the Channel. Donald Trump’s initial foreign policy moves brought the need for rapid re-armament to the top of the to-do list for UK and European politicians. Then, just after the end of the quarter came ‘Liberation Day’, sending global markets into freefall, only for most of the tariffs introduced by the US president to be postponed and reduced a matter of days later. 

Against this backdrop, the fund made 1.6%, compared with a gain of 1.5% from its IA Strategic Bond sector. 

The fund’s performance remains robust and it is top quartile over one, three and five years, demonstrating the benefit of allowing higher income to compound over the long term:


Three months One year Three years Five years
Artemis High Income Fund 1.6% 8.1% 15.7% 41.8%
IA Strategic Bond 1.5% 5.0% 5.1% 15.7%
Sector quartile  2
Past performance is not a guide to future returns. Source: Artemis/Lipper Limited, class I Inc GBP to 31 March 2025.  All figures show total returns with dividends and/or income reinvested, net of all charges. Performance does not take account of any costs incurred when investors buy or sell the fund. Returns may vary as a result of currency fluctuations if the investor's currency is different to that of the class. This class may have charges or a hedging approach different from those in the IA sector benchmark.

Contributors

On the equities side, banks Barclays and NatWest continued to do well, benefiting from the contribution of higher interest rates to net interest margins (the difference between the interest they receive from loans and what they pay on customer deposits). We took some profits from these positions, as well as other strong performers 3i and Deutsche Telekom, although we still like all four. 

In fixed income, our Treasuries and TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) made a positive contribution as bond yields fell.

Detractors

Our shares in Melrose were the biggest detractors from performance. The aerospace company lowered near-term cashflow guidance, primarily due to a new contract for one of its jet engine programmes which is currently unprofitable. Yet based on longer-term expected free cashflow generation, its shares look cheap compared with peers. 

Bookmaker Entain fell on concerns that US consumers would be hit by tariffs and spend less on sports betting and gaming. We are relatively relaxed – UK online sports betting and gaming has been around a lot longer and proved to be resilient throughout the Global Financial Crisis, Covid, the cost-of-living crisis and so on. 

Shares in Tesco fell after competitor Asda initiated a price war. 

Activity

Among our biggest purchases during the quarter were:

  • JP Morgan – we bought short-dated senior bonds (one year until maturity), which offered attractive carry with very little downside risk.
  • Shift4 Payments 2032s – this payments-technology company has grown quickly and is now a market leader in providing payment services for hospitality businesses around the world. It is currently rated Ba3/BB, but we believe the growth in revenues and an inflection in earnings/cashflow mean further upgrades are likely to follow.
  • GFL Environmental 2029s – we have owned shorter-dated bonds in GFL, the North American waste-management company, for the past year. We bought these longer-dated bonds as we believe the recently announced sale of its environmental services division (alongside stated plans to pay down debt with the proceeds) should see a re-rating to investment grade, the company’s stated target.
  • Capstone Copper – this is a Canadian-headquartered copper producer with mines in Chile, Mexico and the US. We bought its bonds at a new issue as it is a high-quality company with meaningful deleveraging potential as new mines open. 

We sold down positions in gilts and TIPS during the quarter, but after the end of the period and the Liberation Day tariffs, we bought back in after both lagged.

In response to Trump’s 2 April announcement, we also topped up positions in:

  • CBR – this German fashion wholesaler has no exposure to US tariffs (it sells into Germany and neighbouring countries), while it sailed through Covid with no issues. Yields on its bonds increased to almost 9% in GBP-hedged terms in April. 
  • Forvia – the autos sector was among those hardest hit by the tariffs, but Forvia makes parts that tend to be quite bulky and are therefore not sold over country lines, while factories are typically co-located near to car manufacturing plants. It is a strong company with resilient cashflows, low leverage and a strong track record of managing through auto-industry downturns.
  • IGT – this global gaming-technology company has highly rated bonds (split between BB+ and investment grade) with clear catalysts for getting to full investment grade in the near term, which should result in a significant tightening in spreads. 

Outlook

As we are about to send this out, it looks like Trump is walking back on the Liberation Day tariffs (barring those on China). 

So as with everything at the moment, the shelf life of what we have written below has probably already expired – but for what it’s worth…

As markets experience volatility, it’s important to remember that for income-focused strategies like ours, income continues accruing and being paid every day even as markets go up, down or sideways. That is the beauty of such a strategy: we are not relying on market sentiment to drive returns; we have a different mechanism at our disposal. It is by allowing this income to generate and compound over the long term that we can create great outcomes for clients – and there is nothing within our portfolio that is making us think that the fundamental compounding (which has occurred in this strategy for the past 23 years) will come to an end.

We have very little CCC exposure, instead focusing on higher-quality high yield (alongside our holdings in investment grade, government bonds and solidly growing dividend-paying equities), which sets us up very well.

Since 2 April, we have managed to pick up a few attractively priced bargains, as discussed briefly above. But our most important act has been to stick to our knitting and refrain from getting too carried away by the volatility. Ultimately, we are buying good-quality companies that, primarily through coupons but also through dividends, will give our investors a strong core of income to either meet their personal needs or to reinvest in the market to allow further compounding. We continue to look for opportunities to do just that – whether markets go up, down or sideways.

Benchmark: IA £ Strategic Bond NR; A group of other asset managers’ funds that invest in similar asset types as this fund, collated by the Investment Association. It acts as a ‘target benchmark’ that the fund aims to outperform. Management of the fund is not restricted by this benchmark.

Investment in a fund concerns the acquisition of units/shares in the fund and not in the underlying assets of the fund.

Reference to specific shares or companies should not be taken as advice or a recommendation to invest in them.

For information on sustainability-related aspects of a fund, visit the relevant fund page on this website.

For information about Artemis’ fund structures and registration status, visit artemisfunds.com/fund-structures

Any research and analysis in this communication has been obtained by Artemis for its own use. Although this communication is based on sources of information that Artemis believes to be reliable, no guarantee is given as to its accuracy or completeness.

Any statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions and are subject to change without notice. They are not intended to provide investment advice and should not be construed as a recommendation.

Third parties (including FTSE and Morningstar) whose data may be included in this document do not accept any liability for errors or omissions. For information, visit artemisfunds.com/third-party-data.

Important information
The intention of Artemis’ ‘investment insights’ articles is to present objective news, information, data and guidance on finance topics drawn from a diverse collection of sources. Content is not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security or investment by Artemis or any third-party. Potential investors should consider the need for independent financial advice. Any research or analysis has been procured by Artemis for its own use and may be acted on in that connection. The contents of articles are based on sources of information believed to be reliable; however, save to the extent required by applicable law or regulations, no guarantee, warranty or representation is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions, expectations and projections. Articles are provided to you only incidentally, and any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The source for all data is Artemis, unless stated otherwise. The value of an investment, and any income from it, can fall as well as rise as a result of market and currency fluctuations and you may not get back the amount originally invested.