Skip to main content

Forget trying to get rich – how about not getting poorer?

Simon Edelsten discusses whether investors might be wiser to consider "steady Eddie" stocks over chasing more generous dividends. The preservation of wealth in the current environment, interest rates and inflation considered, might be wiser than looking for growth.

Let me take you back to the summer of 2018. It was the hottest on record for the UK. Inflation was running at less than 2 percent, interest rates were at 0.75 percent, and 18mn people watched Meghan Markle marry Prince Harry and wished them well. 

Five years later, inflation is nearly 8 percent. Interest rates – 5.25 percent today – are expected to rise towards 5.75 percent by the end of this year. And Meghan and Harry? Well, times change. 

Although headline inflation is falling – mainly due to fuel prices dropping back to levels from before the invasion of Ukraine — wage inflation seems persistent in the UK. The problem of inflation is not going away quickly. For many investors used to trying to build up their wealth, just preserving its value is now the priority.  

Today, several savings firms offer cash products yielding 6 percent – though often requiring you to lock in for three years. While inflation stays so high, this is costing you nearly 2 percent a year in purchasing power. At that rate your £1 will be worth around 82p in a decade. Not great, but these returns set a new benchmark for what to expect from other investments.

One area of portfolios worth re-examining is dividend-paying stalwarts. Many high-yielding shares trade on low multiples of earnings and are seen as value stocks. Take National Grid – perhaps the epitome of a solid, steady, low-growth company. It offered a better-than-average yield of 5.5 percent in 2018. That looked juicy when interest rates were low.

National Grid’s earnings are linked to the assets it employs in electricity networks in the UK and the US, where it has a substantial business. These are rising as it plugs in the ever-growing network of renewables.  The growth in earnings has shown in a rising dividend. Between 2018 and 2020 National Grid’s dividend grew from 46p to 49p, keeping up with inflation. From 2020 up to this year’s final dividend the payment should rise to 58p – an increase of 18 percent. But the cost of living will have risen by about 25 percent in the same period. The rising cash dividend may feel good, but you are actually getting poorer.

And dividends must be viewed in the context of share prices. National Grid’s share price has risen in five years from around £8 to just over £10. So anyone buying in 2018 did pretty well. But the consequence of that price rise is that the yield is the same now as it was five years ago. 

With dividend increases failing to keep pace with inflation, the share price may be vulnerable to a fall to help restore the attractive yield relative to cash. National Grid is not an outlier. 

In 2018 the yield on the FTSE 100 was about 4.5 percent. Today it is the same. Is that enough to compensate you for owning shares rather than leaving money in the bank?

Income managers will remind you that the dividend is only part of the story – an important one. But there is a bit of growth, too, hopefully. 

It is a fair point, but investors should be very careful about assuming that the dividend element they see in the headline data on their investment platform is in the bag – or that share price growth is assured.

By way of illustration, potential takeover target BT is down 34 percent in the past year. It is now delivering a 6 percent yield, but analysts say rising interest rates mean it needs to cut that dividend drastically to avoid a big rise in its debt costs. If it does, the share price could fall further. 

Tear up the textbooks?

Looking across the market, you would normally expect higher interest rates to lead to higher yields in equities. The old-school theory was that value stocks should outperform in times of inflation. Higher inflation leads to higher interest rates and on to higher discount rates. As a result, immediate earnings are worth more to investors than hoped-for cash flow. 

The chart below plots the MSCI World Value Index versus the All-Country World Index 

 This chart plots the MSCI World Value Index versus the All-Country World Index
Source: Bloomberg 1 August 2023

As can be seen, value stocks had a period of outperformance in 2022. But this was largely because the oil stocks in a value basket rose significantly on the invasion of Ukraine. The value index has fallen back this year. So much for the textbooks. 

A couple of reasons come to mind. Value-type stocks are often in sectors with poor pricing power (think chemicals), high debts (try utilities and telecoms) and often high labour costs (construction). 

The market sees many of today’s growth stocks as a better alternative. Investors believe they can outdistance inflation and maintain margin – a slightly exaggerated hope, perhaps, when you see the speed at which big tech has been laying off staff lately. 

Generally speaking, though, growth stocks that have strong earnings and are reinvesting the bulk of their profits do look more attractive in the face of inflation. That does not mean you should overpay. Some of the share prices in the tech growth sector are now eye-watering. Nvidia could fall 40 percent but still would not attract new buyers disciplined about cashflow-based valuation.

Is there a middle way?

Well, first it is worth digging below the aggregate numbers. In the US, on average, yields have fallen since 2018. This is largely because of the rise in technology stocks, which often pay no dividends. 

But look deeper. Kinder Morgan, the largest US gas pipeline company – so a bit like National Grid – used to yield 4.5 percent. Its dividends have risen from $0.725 in 2018 to around $1.12 this year. That is a rise of more than 50 percent over five years. Meanwhile, its share price has moved little. So it now yields 6.5 percent. Globally, there are still some decent-yielding companies lifting their dividends.

Within the growth arena I would look for stocks on middling ratings – TSMC, the Taiwanese chipmaker, for instance, on 20 times earnings, and Intel, on 15 times. Both available through US markets, they offer some modest yield. Are the cutting-edge stocks priced to perfection really worth so much more? How far would they fall on any failure to keep pace with the hype around them?

There are plenty of steady Eddie stocks that are not that pricey and have long records of maintaining high margins and reinvesting profits wisely. They may not offer the most generous dividends, but they may be better placed to preserve your wealth. Dividends can be important, but be confident they are rising and well covered. Look beyond the headline yield numbers before pressing “buy”. 

Investment in a fund concerns the acquisition of units/shares in the fund and not in the underlying assets of the fund.

Reference to specific shares or companies should not be taken as advice or a recommendation to invest in them.

For information on sustainability-related aspects of a fund, visit the relevant fund page on this website.

For information about Artemis’ fund structures and registration status, visit artemisfunds.com/fund-structures

Any research and analysis in this communication has been obtained by Artemis for its own use. Although this communication is based on sources of information that Artemis believes to be reliable, no guarantee is given as to its accuracy or completeness.

Any statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions and are subject to change without notice. They are not intended to provide investment advice and should not be construed as a recommendation.

Third parties (including FTSE and Morningstar) whose data may be included in this document do not accept any liability for errors or omissions. For information, visit artemisfunds.com/third-party-data.

Important information
The intention of Artemis’ ‘investment insights’ articles is to present objective news, information, data and guidance on finance topics drawn from a diverse collection of sources. Content is not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security or investment by Artemis or any third-party. Potential investors should consider the need for independent financial advice. Any research or analysis has been procured by Artemis for its own use and may be acted on in that connection. The contents of articles are based on sources of information believed to be reliable; however, save to the extent required by applicable law or regulations, no guarantee, warranty or representation is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions, expectations and projections. Articles are provided to you only incidentally, and any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The source for all data is Artemis, unless stated otherwise. The value of an investment, and any income from it, can fall as well as rise as a result of market and currency fluctuations and you may not get back the amount originally invested.